Fake social media statements claiming US-Iran conflict circulated for hours before the IRGC denied them, as the 60-day Hormuz truce faced its first major test.
Iran's Revolutionary Guard publicly disavowed social media statements claiming conflict with the US, as the June 17 Hormuz truce faced its first major test after an attack on a cargo vessel.
"The statements circulating on social media are not from the Revolutionary Guard and are fabricated content," the IRGC's public relations director said.
The denial came hours after multiple forged statements began circulating on social media platforms, coinciding with heightened tensions after the June 25 attack on the Ever Lovely, a Singapore-registered container ship struck on its starboard side while transiting near the Omani coast. Two US officials told Reuters that Iran fired on the vessel. The International Maritime Organization subsequently paused its evacuation program for ships stranded in the Gulf since hostilities erupted in late February.
The incident represents the most serious challenge to the 60-day framework signed June 17, under which the US committed to easing its naval blockade and releasing frozen Iranian assets while Iran agreed to allow commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz without tolls. Brent crude briefly rose above $75 a barrel after the attack before settling at $73.79, while both major benchmarks were on course for weekly losses of about 8 percent as oil exports gradually recovered.
Two Shipping Frameworks Collide in the Strait
The maritime environment in the Strait of Hormuz is now shaped by two competing systems. One is backed by Oman and coordinated by the International Maritime Organization, offering ships voluntary evacuation routes through Omani territorial waters to bypass mined or high-risk areas. The other is controlled by Iran through its Persian Gulf Strait Authority and the IRGC Navy, which requires vessels to follow Iranian-designated lanes and obtain electronic authorization before entering.
Hours before the Ever Lovely attack, Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority warned that "consequences arising from passage through unauthorized routes shall be the responsibility of the owner, operator, and vessel commander." The IRGC Navy separately announced that safe transit would only be guaranteed for ships using Iranian-designated shipping lanes. British maritime security company Ambrey reported that two Panama-flagged vessels were instructed by Revolutionary Guard forces to alter their course, while three commercial tankers abandoned their intended passage after receiving hostile radio communications.
Oil Markets Price a Fragile Recovery
Despite the attack, crude exports through the Strait have risen to their highest levels since fighting began in February. US Energy Secretary Chris Wright said at least 20 million barrels of oil exited the waterway in the 24 hours before his statement, while President Donald Trump put the figure at 19 million barrels. Saudi Aramco resumed crude loading at its Ras Tanura terminal after a four-month suspension, with two Very Large Crude Carriers seen loading cargo.
The last time the Strait faced a comparable disruption was during the February escalation, when US and Israeli military operations against Iran began, shutting down one of the world's busiest energy corridors. Before the conflict, about 125 ships passed through the Strait daily, handling roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies. Current vessel traffic remains a fraction of that level.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, wrapping up a Gulf tour, said there was zero support among Gulf countries for any Iranian attempt to impose tolls on the Strait, warning that such a move would create "total chaos." President Trump issued a stronger warning, saying, "If I don't like it, if they don't behave, we'll go right back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their head."
A direct deconfliction mechanism between the IRGC and US Central Command, established under the June 17 agreement and based in Doha, Qatar, remains operational. Vice President JD Vance confirmed the channel is intended to provide immediate communication if incidents occur at sea, allowing commanders on both sides to exchange information before events escalate into direct military confrontation.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.