Content
Step 1 — You link your accounts, read-only
Step 2 — The first screen isn't a spending pie chart
Step 3 — It surfaces the tax gap most people miss
Step 4 — It makes your concentration concrete
Step 5 — It puts resilience before returns
The part no other tool does
What it's good at — and what it's not
How it compares
The bottom line
Sources

Markets Confusing? Ask Ed Search.

Instant answers, zero BS, and trading decisions your future self will thank you for.

Try Search Now

Your RSUs Just Vested. Here's What a Money Tool Surfaces First.

Edwealth
· Jul 15 2026
Your RSUs Just Vested. Here's What a Money Tool Surfaces First.

You just had a big RSU grant vest. Congratulations — and now the awkward part: a six-figure pile of your own company's stock, a vague sense you should "do something," and no one actually telling you what. An advisor, a spreadsheet, and a piece of software each handle this moment differently. Here's what a modern money tool surfaces in a moment like this — using Ed as a worked example — so you can decide what kind of help actually fits.

Key takeaways - A money tool's first job isn't to categorize your spending — it's to tell you whether your money could survive a bad month. - RSUs vest as ordinary income, but employers usually withhold a flat 22% — often below a high earner's real bracket. The shortfall quietly becomes a bill in April. - After a few years of vesting, a large share of your net worth can end up in one stock. Seeing that number is the point; trimming is your call. - The honest analogy: a financial advisor's first conversation — without the asset minimum. - Takes a few minutes. Run a free check-up →

You connect your brokerage and bank through read-only aggregation, so the tool can read balances but can't move a dollar. Ed's framing is simple: precise about your money, blind to your identity.

Step 2 — The first screen isn't a spending pie chart

Instead of sorting your lattes into categories, Ed opens on a single Financial Reality Check — a read on whether your money could survive a bad month. For a lot of high earners, that one number lands harder than any budget, because it answers a question the other apps never ask. (If the Reality Check is the numbers side, your money type is the behavior behind them — the two together are the full starting point.)

Step 3 — It surfaces the tax gap most people miss

RSUs vest as ordinary income, taxed like salary in the year they vest (IRS). But the standard federal withholding on a vest is a flat 22% — rising to 37% only above $1 million in a year (IRS Publication 15). If your real marginal rate is 32% or 35%, that 22% isn't "taxes paid" — it's a down payment, and the difference waits quietly until April.

At vest Standard withholding A high earner's real bracket The gap that waits for April
Taxed as ordinary income 22% flat up to 35–37% 10–15 points under-withheld

Ed's Tax Check-up surfaces that gap between the 22% standard and your actual bracket; your CPA fills in the exact number. (And if you also exercise ISOs, the alternative minimum tax is a known risk worth raising with that CPA — not something to guess at.)

Step 4 — It makes your concentration concrete

After a few years of vesting, it's common to wake up with a huge share of your net worth in one stock — the same company that already pays your salary. Ed shows your concentration percentage — the share sitting in a single position — and surfaces the question of a cap. When, or whether, to trim is entirely your call; the value is seeing the risk clearly instead of discovering it by accident.

Step 5 — It puts resilience before returns

Rather than jumping to "what should I buy," Ed surfaces a runway shortfall first — the months of expenses that keep a layoff from becoming a crisis — before any investing question comes up. Floor before upside, in that order.

The part no other tool does

Here's the real differentiator: before you connect anything, you can watch Ed's own live account — unpaid, in public. Most fintech apps hide their numbers; Ed shows his. For a decision this size, "watch mine before you trust yours" is a very different starting point than a marketing page.

What it's good at — and what it's not

The strength is the whole picture: cash, equity, tax exposure, and concentration on one screen, plus a tool honest enough to name what it can't do instead of faking certainty.

What it's not: it isn't a robo-advisor that allocates for you, it isn't a budgeting app, and it doesn't replace your CPA on the exact numbers — it surfaces the questions and hands the precise math to a professional.

Who it's for: high earners with equity and scattered accounts who want to see the whole thing in one place. Who should skip it: if you just want spending categories, or a hands-off robo that allocates and never explains itself, this isn't that.

How it compares

Versus a budgeting app, the difference is direction: those look backward at what you spent; this looks forward at what to weigh next. Versus a robo-advisor, a robo just allocates a portfolio, while Ed reasons across cash, tax, and concentration together. The closest honest analogy is a financial advisor's first conversation — without the asset minimum.

The bottom line

For an RSU windfall, the value isn't a magic answer — it's seeing the whole board before you move. Run a free check-up, see your Financial Reality Check, and watch Ed's live book first.

See where you actually stand → · Ed is available on the App Store.

Partner content, produced in partnership with Ed: Wealth. Educational only — not financial, investment, or tax advice; for your exact numbers, see a CPA. Ed: Wealth is a research and self-reflection tool, not a registered investment advisor. Tax rates and withholding are illustrative.

Sources

  • IRS, Publication 525, Taxable and Nontaxable Income (RSUs taxed as ordinary income) — https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-publication-525
  • IRS, Publication 15 (Circular E), Employer's Tax Guide — supplemental wage withholding 22% / 37% — https://www.irs.gov/publications/p15
  • IRS, Topic No. 427, Stock Options & Alternative Minimum Tax (ISOs) — https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc427
Recommend
banner.png

What is financial fitness? A better way to measure your money

Financial fitness is a simple idea: it's not how much money you have, it's whether your money is working for the life you want. Net worth measures the size of your pile. Financial fitness measures whether that pile is actually doing its job — covering you month to month, protecting you when something breaks, and building toward what's next. For most of us, money stopped being a once-a-year conversation a long time ago. There are more decisions now, spread across more accounts, over longer lives. Should you buy the house or wait? What do you do with the RSUs that just vested? Are you actually okay, or does it just look that way? Physical fitness gave us a way to talk about the body. Mental fitness gave us a way to talk about the mind. Financial fitness is the same move for your money — a clear, honest read on where you stand. Net worth is one number, and it hides a lot. Two people can have the exact same net worth and be in completely different shape. One has three months of expenses in
Edwealth
·
Jul 16 2026
banner.jpg

What is a money person? The plain-English alternative to a financial advisor

The short version: a money person is a smart, warm friend who happens to be good with money and explains it like a person, not a bank. Practically, it's a second opinion on your whole financial picture — cash, debt, tax exposure, concentration, and the goals you're working toward — that tells you in plain language what to look at first. It's not a traditional advisor managing your portfolio for 1% a year, and it's not a coach cheering you on. It's the honest read a good advisor's first meeting would give you, without the fee or the asset minimum. It's the role Ed Wealth was built to play. Strip away the label and a money person does four concrete things: Just as important is what it doesn't do: it doesn't take custody of your money, it doesn't sell you products for commission, and it doesn't pretend a forecast is a promise. It's a second opinion: it shows you the structure and lets you decide. People reach for four different things when they say "I should talk to someone." They're not
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.png

Lump sum or dollar-cost averaging? What the math actually says

If you've got a pile of cash to invest and you're stuck between putting it all in today or feeding it in slowly over a few months, here's the short answer: the math says invest it now. Vanguard's research found that a lump sum beat dollar-cost averaging roughly two-thirds of the time. The reason is boring but powerful. Markets go up more often than they go down, so time out of the market usually costs you. But "the math" isn't the whole story, and anyone who tells you it is has never watched their own money drop 15% the week after they invested it. There's a real, rational case for spreading it out. It just isn't the case most people think. The logic is almost too simple. When you hold cash waiting to invest it "at a better time," you're betting the market will be lower later. Sometimes it is. But most of the time it isn't, because stocks and bonds have historically out-earned cash. Vanguard studied this directly in a 2023 paper. Looking at rolling one-year periods from 1976 to 2022, i
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.png

Is the 4% rule still safe? How long your money really lasts

Short answer: yes, for most people the 4% rule is still a sensible place to start. But it was never meant to be a set-and-forget autopilot. It is a starting dial. Understand what it actually promises and you will worry less, spend more comfortably, and avoid the trap most retirees fall into: dying with far more money than they ever needed. In 1994, a financial planner named William Bengen ran a simple experiment. He took every 30-year retirement window in U.S. history back to 1926 and asked: what is the highest starting withdrawal rate that would have survived all of them, including the worst? His answer, published in the Journal of Financial Planning, was about 4.15%. Rounded down, that became "the 4% rule." A few years later, three Trinity University professors ran a similar test and confirmed it. Their 1998 study found that a balanced stock-and-bond portfolio withdrawing 4% (adjusted for inflation) survived 30 years in 95% to 100% of historical periods. Push it to 5% and the success
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.png

Are you actually behind on retirement savings?

Probably not as behind as you think. If you're in your 30s or 40s, saving a little while you raise kids and pay a mortgage, that isn't a personal failure. It's the normal shape of a saving life. The math that scares people, the "you should have three times your salary saved by 40" kind, is a rule of thumb, not a law. And the years that do the heavy lifting for most people haven't even started yet. You've seen the benchmark: 1x your salary saved by 30, 3x by 40, 6x by 50, 8x by 60, and 10x by 67. That's Fidelity's set of savings milestones, and Fidelity itself calls them "aspirational" goalposts you likely won't hit on schedule. They're built on a tidy set of assumptions: you start saving 15% at 25, you invest heavily in stocks, you retire at 67. Change any one of those and the whole staircase shifts. So when someone at 42 with one salary's worth saved feels like a failure, they're comparing their real, messy life to a smooth line drawn for a person who doesn't exist. The honest read is
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.png

Why you feel broke on a good income (and how to fix it)

If you earn well but still feel broke, it's almost never the coffee. It's the two or three big fixed decisions eating your cash flow (housing, cars, and every raise you spent instead of banked) that leave nothing at the end of the month. The fix isn't tracking pennies. It's controlling the spending rate on the few categories that dominate your budget, then banking half of every raise. A high salary and a tight month are not a contradiction. In the LendingClub paycheck-to-paycheck survey, 44% of people earning more than $100,000 a year said they had little or nothing left after paying their bills. That's not a small unlucky group. That's nearly half of high earners. And it stacks up fast. The Federal Reserve's 2024 survey found that 37% of adults couldn't cover a surprise $400 expense with cash. Some of those people are on good incomes. A big paycheck doesn't automatically buy breathing room. How you spend it does. So if the number on your offer letter looks great and your bank balance
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.png

Should you pay off your mortgage or invest? (the honest math)

The short version: paying extra on your mortgage is a guaranteed, risk-free return equal to your interest rate. So the real question isn't "mortgage or market" — it's whether your mortgage rate is higher or lower than what you can reliably earn elsewhere, after tax and after risk. In 2026 that math has flipped. With 30-year rates near 6.5% and top savings accounts around 4%, prepaying a 6.5% mortgage is a ~6.5% guaranteed return that cash can't touch and even stocks can't promise. But there are three things you should do before you choose either. Every extra dollar you put toward your mortgage principal earns you a guaranteed return equal to your mortgage rate. Pay down a 6.5% loan and you've locked in 6.5%, risk-free, for the life of that dollar. No fund does that. So line it up against the honest alternatives: When your mortgage rate is above what cash pays and close to what stocks might pay with real risk attached, the "boring" move — paying it down — is quietly one of the best risk
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.jpg

How Much Does a Financial Advisor Cost? (+ the Free Alternative)

The short version: most financial advisors charge about 1% of the money they manage per year — roughly $3,000 a year on a $300,000 portfolio, whether or not your situation changed. But "1%" hides four very different fee models, plus fund costs and commissions underneath. The number that actually matters isn't the percentage; it's the all-in cost in dollars, over years. Here's how to work that out — and what to do if you want clarity without paying 1% a year to get it. Almost every fee structure is a version of one of these: The 1% AUM model is the default you'll meet most often, and it's worth understanding exactly what it costs, because the percentage framing is designed to feel painless. One percent sounds like a rounding error. In dollars, it isn't. On a $300,000 portfolio, 1% is about $3,000 every year — a fixed cost that doesn't shrink in a year when nothing about your plan changed. Hold that account for 20 years and you've paid at least $60,000 in direct fees alone, before you ev
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.jpg

Is a financial advisor worth it? Advisor vs robo vs money person

The short version: a financial advisor is worth it when your money has real complexity — a business, concentrated stock, an estate, a divorce, or turning savings into retirement income. There, a fee pays for itself. But most people don't have a complexity problem; they have a clarity one, and paying 1% of your assets a year — about $3,000 on a $300,000 portfolio, every year — is a lot to pay for reassurance. You have three tiers to choose from: a human advisor (~1% of assets), a robo-advisor (~0.25%), and a money person — a flat-fee second opinion that doesn't grow as your savings do. Start with the honest case for paying. A good advisor earns their fee when your situation is genuinely complex: selling a business, a big block of company stock or options, an estate with kids, a divorce, a windfall, or building a retirement-income plan with real moving parts. In those moments, one right call can save you many times the fee, and the job becomes picking a good one (that's how to choose a f
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026
banner.jpg

Do You Actually Need a Financial Advisor? (An Honest Test)

The short version: you need a financial advisor when your money has genuine complexity — equity comp across several employers, a business sale, an estate with kids involved, a divorce, a sudden windfall, or a retirement-drawdown plan with real moving parts. If your situation is closer to "I earn well but somehow feel behind," that's a clarity problem, not a complexity one, and hiring someone to manage your money for about 1% a year is an expensive way to solve it. Here's how to tell which one you have. Almost everyone reaching for an advisor falls into one of two camps, and confusing them is where money gets wasted. A complexity problem is when there are real moving parts that interact: decisions where a wrong move costs far more than any fee. Selling a company, exercising stock options with a tax bill attached, splitting assets in a divorce, planning how to draw income across a 30-year retirement. Here, a good advisor earns their keep. A clarity problem looks different. Good income, a
Edwealth
·
Jul 15 2026

Your money person, finally.

Try Ed free. No credit card. No commitment.